Some brave Democratic politicians have come out to oppose
this threatened war, but as expected all the major Obama-loving, previously rabidly
anti-war celebrities have been absolutely silent – obviously they’re anti-war
only when a Republican is president so it’s really not at all war that they care
anything about. In fact, super-liberal Ed
Asner has admitted publicly that the erstwhile anti-war Democrat celebrities
are staying silent because they don't want to appear racist in criticizing Obama;
of course this is a big concern for them because up until now they themselves
have smeared as racist anyone who dared oppose Obama.
To contribute their fair share to the ridiculousness of this bad theater, some
Republicans have come out to support Obama’s proposed little war; for example, Bill Kristol of the Weekly Standard, the
editors of National Review, and even talk show host Hugh Hewitt, as well as a
plethora of Republican politicians who never met an air strike they didn't like
(e.g., the dopey Bobbsey Twins John McCain and Lindsey Graham). Even Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner
and House number two man Eric Cantor are giving Obama political cover for his
proposed little adventure – not for nothing are they leaders in the Stupid
Party.
Of course the Syrians in power have been killing, and
allegedly even gassing, some of their people for a long time, so why attack
them now? Why now? Well, one credible reason is to distract
attention from Obama's growing domestic scandals. Just as Clinton started lobbing bombs when
the White House sex scandal was heating up, now it's Obama's turn to explode
some people so that Republicans will stop talking about all the other bad stuff
he's been doing. Other bad stuff like
the disgraceful IRS scandal wherein Democrat employees of the IRS and other
federal agencies have been harassing, with non-approvals and audits,
conservative organizations for years, a scandal that has so far reached as far as
the top Obama appointee at the Agency. A
scandal like the Benghazi debacle, in which Obama and his team clearly failed
to provide adequate security in advance, despicably failed to allow the
military to support and rescue the besieged Americans being attacked on the
ground in Benghazi (a battle that went on for about 12 hours in which four
Americans died), and then disgracefully suppressed the truth about it
all ever since.
The final absurdity about this proposed attack on Syria is that it would be attacking the current government in support of Al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-led rebels who are even more hostile to the United States and Christians living in Syria than those now in power there. It makes absolutely no sense, but then Obama's purpose is not to make sense, is not to seek justice -- it is to distract and mess with the minds of dopey Republicans. If Obama is so easy with the use of military force, why did he order the United States military to step down and stop their rapidly developing support and rescue of the besieged Americans under attack in Benghazi? If military force to rescue Americans is unacceptable, why is military force to help Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria now a moral imperative?
If one thing is clear about Obama and his core cadre of red diaper baby Alinskyites who are rabidly hostile to traditional American values, it is that you can never listen to what they say but always must watch what they do with open eyes and a clear head. And as for those confused and misguided Republicans and “conservatives” who now are joining forces with and supporting Obama, Axelrod, Hillary Clinton and the others in the Alinskyite gang, to borrow a phrase, not even do they not know who the marks are they don’t even realize they’re playing in a game.
