In popularity Cendrillon does not rank with Massenet’s main four
– Manon and Werther, followed by Don Quichotte and Thais. The Prince is a
“trouser” role, written for a contralto and featuring a mezzo in this
production; for me, the opera would be more appealing if the part were transposed
for a tenor.
Soprano Siobhan Stagg was terrific in the title role in her
American debut, and I also particularly enjoyed bass-baritone Derek Welton as her
meek but gentle and caring father. Sets consisted
of various moving panels with writing on them – inexpensive, minimalist, and very
uninteresting. I know opera companies
are struggling with cost control, but this was a pretty lame effort. The show was almost a concert version in
costume. The blame for the set, though,
gets spread around to many other opera companies, so the Lyric is mostly off
the hook. Hell, even the Met used it.
I’m happy to have seen Cendrillon,
though I don’t think I would go out of my way to see it again. If an opera company is going through the
expense of putting on a show, there are a lot more appealing choices on the
list before you come to Cendrillon. The set was available, sure, but sets
abound. And it’s not as if a packaged cast,
already rehearsed, was readily available, for only Alice Coote as Prince Charming
was a carry-over from last spring’s production at the Met. So here are two picks, for example, that jump to
mind long before Cendrillon – Puccini’s
sleeper Manon Lescaut, last seen on
the Lyric stage 13 years ago and just that once since 1977, and even Massenet’s
own take on that story, Manon, regarded
by some as his best opera and last seen at the Lyric in 1983 – 35 years ago.
R Balsamo
No comments:
Post a Comment