Award-winning "Piss Christ" "artwork" |
Those moderns apologetic about Western culture, known as
liberals in America, generally give Muslims a pass on behaviors they, the
liberals, claim to care deeply about, such as women’s rights (but wearing a full
body bag is liberating, and it’s not really genital mutilation but rather a
ritual, symbolic “nick”), freedom of speech (but we need to be especially sensitive
when we talk about religion, except for Christianity of course), freedom of
religion (but we need to be culturally sensitive when Muslims kill Muslims who
want to leave Islam for another religion), freedom of sexual expression (but we
really need to be culturally sensitive when Muslims kill homosexuals), and
freedom to not be blown up (but we must look inward to understand why we have
made them so angry at us, and then change ourselves). These practices not uncommon in the Muslim world are
not really problems, and to the extent they might be it’s really all our fault,
but damn those troglodyte, medieval American Christians who want to ban third
trimester abortions!
Liberals working in movies, TV, theater, on stage, and in the arts make fun of Christianity and Christian
religious figures all the time. Christianity is fair game for attacks by
haters – the award-winning piece of "art" called “Piss Christ” (link) is a perfect case in
point, consisting of a crucifix, a representation of the crucified Jesus Christ, placed in a jar of the “artist’s” urine,
funded by American taxpayers and defended and celebrated by liberals everywhere
(freedom of speech!). Academics also love to whack Christianity – remember the "Stomp on Jesus" college class exercise (link)?; I'm still waiting for the "Stomp on Muhammad", but not holding my breath. But in a rare, unplanned
candid moment, an entertainer or artist may admit that Islam is off limits
because, after all, who wants to be killed for a novel or a joke or a movie or a picture
of Muhammad in a jar of urine; and anyways, Christians are such soft targets
since they turn the other cheek, but those Muslims, well, better not mess with them.
Even Jimmy Carter, a Democrat American president, urged a show of sensitivity to the hurt feelings of
Muslims over Rushdie’s book and held Rushdie partially responsible (in a variation of the long-recognized "Blame America First" mind-set). Per Wikipedia (link):
Former United States president
Jimmy Carter, while condemning the threats and fatwā against Rushdie, stated,
"we have tended to promote him and his book with little acknowledgment
that it is a direct insult to those millions of Moslems whose sacred beliefs
have been violated and are suffering in restrained silence the added
embarrassment of the Ayatollah's irresponsibility". He also held that Rushdie must have been aware
of the response his book would evoke: "The author, a well-versed analyst
of Moslem beliefs, must have anticipated a horrified reaction throughout the
Islamic world". He saw a need to be
"sensitive to the concern and anger" of Muslims....
"Sensitive to the anger of Muslims" – an endorsement of the heckler's veto (link; incidentally, a term coined by a UChicago professor). Well, I'm offended by "Piss Christ" and its funding by the American government, but so far I haven't heard Jimmy Carter express concern about my feelings and chastise the "artist". Carter’s public spinelessness, and that of so many others in
the West, communicated a lot to the Muslim world (to wit, Osama bin Laden’s obliquely calling
America and the West a “weak horse” [link]) and encouraged many true believers in it to continue
to test limits against Western values. Such testing continues
today, and although it arguably started with the Suez crisis it gathered steam with the seizure of the American Embassy in Iran and
long mistreatment of the Americans captured there, two events which then-President Carter was too weak and
too conflicted to handle. As wags have
suggested somewhat tongue-in-cheek, perhaps if Christians took a cue from their
Muslim fellow humans and occasionally set off a bomb or lopped off a head, they
would be accorded some of the respect and deference Western liberals have long
given Muslims. Can Popes issue murder fatwas?
No comments:
Post a Comment