Obama’s lawless immigration decree is outrageous and ominous,
but, sadly, entirely predictable given the distain shown the Constitution and proper
legal process by Obama and his supporters.
Obama is also, as he often does, testing limits, to see what he and his
fellow control masters can get away with.
A de facto amnesty
affecting millions of illegal aliens, contrary to established law and the will
of elected federal representatives, is far beyond anything this Republic has
yet seen on this subject. There are existing immigration
laws that, like all laws, should be enforced until they are changed. If they need to be changed they should be
changed, but until such time they are the laws of the land. The doctrine of prosecutorial discretion,
heretofore a limited, practical prioritization of cases by prosecutors with
limited resources, is now being used to justify a sweeping executive action involving
many millions. Furthermore, however
tenuous the Obama rationalization is in invoking prosecutorial discretion on a
massive scale, what he cannot do, but has said he will do, is confer on those he is essentially pardoning positive
legal rights such as work permits not permitted under existing law.
Despite repeated previous announcements that he was not the “Emperor of the United States” and “could not legally” issue the dictate that he just in fact did, once all federal elections during his presidency were over this former ersatz lecturer in Constitutional law decided to go ahead and make the decree anyway, Constitution be damned. Quite predictably, the gaggle of lawyers working for him quickly patched together a legal justification, chock full of hair-splitting and analogizing that voilà! discovered that everything in Obama’s edict is all hunky dory with the US Constitution, legal precedents (real or imagined), the Articles of Confederation, the Magna Carta, and the Ten Commandments. Indeed, time and again without fail ultraliberal lawyers through their patented legalistic legerdemain, their semantic razzmatazz, can justify legally any action taken by any Democrat president, any time, anywhere.
The supporters of this dictate gleefully argue that it’s a
good idea, a very good idea indeed according to their self-regarded superior and
virtuous minds, and therefore it should be done, and can be done, by whatever
means necessary. The puppet-masters of
the Democrat Party are manipulating their gullible and malleable dependents and acolytes by essentially
declaring that there is an unwritten “Gridlock Clause” lurking somewhere in the
penumbras and emanations of the United States Constitution that makes the President a dictator
if “Congress doesn’t act” in a way he sees fit on any law he himself deems "broken".
As Benjamin Franklin said to the American people, you have a Republic –
if you can keep it.Despite repeated previous announcements that he was not the “Emperor of the United States” and “could not legally” issue the dictate that he just in fact did, once all federal elections during his presidency were over this former ersatz lecturer in Constitutional law decided to go ahead and make the decree anyway, Constitution be damned. Quite predictably, the gaggle of lawyers working for him quickly patched together a legal justification, chock full of hair-splitting and analogizing that voilà! discovered that everything in Obama’s edict is all hunky dory with the US Constitution, legal precedents (real or imagined), the Articles of Confederation, the Magna Carta, and the Ten Commandments. Indeed, time and again without fail ultraliberal lawyers through their patented legalistic legerdemain, their semantic razzmatazz, can justify legally any action taken by any Democrat president, any time, anywhere.
Impeachment and removal is the simple Constitutional remedy
for Presidential lawlessness, though certainly the Republicans will not muster
up for that fight. And even if they
tried, the vice-like grip that radical liberals have on the levers of culture
and media will thwart with vicious force the undoubtedly hesitant, bumbling,
and contradictory moves Republicans would make.
Patriots who seek to preserve this system of government, this Great Experiment,
will seek other avenues of action – through the purse and through the courts.
Obama’s latest outrage is consistent with the strategic
principles of the modern Democrat Party, which are: (1) remember that the ends justify the
means; (2) collapse the system upon itself and grab more power in the disarray;
(3) distract and fool the foolable by relentlessly smearing any and all opponents as
racist, sexist, homophobic, and selfish dimwits; and (4) ever expand the mass of
people dependent on government for welfare and for jobs, creating these modern-day serfs who will faithfully vote for the Democrat party puppet masters (who, as one
wag has put it, regard illegal aliens as “undocumented Democrats”) no matter
what is happening to the fabric of the Republic.
This Republic, which few at the beginning thought could last this long, exists on a shared set of values and
beliefs. When it ends, if it ends, it will
not likely end in one fell blow, but rather will die of many cuts, over time,
until there is no blood left to sustain its life. This cut was deep. The American body politic has shown great
healing powers, so we shall see what comes of this latest gash.
R Balsamo
No comments:
Post a Comment