Rahm Emanuel, Chicago's ultraliberal mayor and former no-holds-barred political operator for Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, has declared (link) that Chick-fil-A's president's public support for the traditional definition of marriage is inconsistent with "Chicago's values." Chicago's values. This comes on the heels of a Chicago alderman's declaration that he'll try to block a Chick-fil-A from opening a site in his ward because he doesn't agree with the company's president's personal views, echoing the recent similar pronouncement from Boston's benighted mayor. And, of course, there is not a hint or allegation that the company discriminates in any way against anybody or is breaking any laws whatsoever. Link
Putting aside the ridiculousness and frighteningly-threatening specter of the mayor of a municipality in a free republic declaring approved specific social values and punishment for dissenters, just what might "Chicago values" be? Profound, chronic, and costly vile corruption by the Democrat party which has fooled and helped to further impoverish enough poor and immigrants to keep it in power? (The unofficial motto of the city, after all, according to the late Chicago-guy Mike Royko is "Where's Mine", paired with an open and outstretched palm, as in "where's my share of the take".) Record-breaking street violence and gang murder?
By the way, the Catholic Church endorses the traditional definition of marriage (as does B Obama at least publicly). Is Emanuel anti-Catholic? And, many and perhaps most Muslim organizations seem quite, ahem, supportive of the traditional definition of marriage. Is Rahm anti-Muslim, heaven forbid to a liberal?
Another Chicago value in action from Rahm Emanuel, who's nominally Jewish but is actually a high priest of the Church of Liberalism: vicious anti-Semitism and anti-white ideology is hunky dory and so apparently a "Chicago Value". Headline today at the very liberal Chicago Sun-Times: "Rahm welcomes help from [Nation of Islam leader] Farrakahn, ignores anti-Semitic remarks". (Another link.)
John M Greco
Thursday, July 26, 2012
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Obama & Skipping Out on Student Loan Debt
Of course the Obama proposal is just a naked pander for the
youth vote and is consistent with Obama’s stated aim of “spreading the wealth
around”. I say Obama backers are much more
likely to be current and future student loan defaulters than Romney supporters;
I doubt anyone would want to fade me on that.
But to consider the proposal seriously for a moment:
The student loan process differs from others in that the likelihood
of the borrower’s ability to pay back the loan is not a factor in whether the
loan is granted in the first place or in setting the interest rate to be charged. So if student loan debt can be later made to
disappear, thus stiffing taxpayers (i.e., me) on government loans or private
lenders on private loans, while infuriating those who dutifully paid off their own student loans, then the likelihood of the student’s defaulting must
be taken into consideration in the granting process.
How about this as the major factor – the relevance of the
major to subsequent job prospects and ability to earn a wage that might
actually be enough to pay off a loan. Pursuing
a degree in science or technology – no problem.
Engineering or math – no problem.
Economics or business – no problem.
Medieval French poetry, lesbian studies, or pop psychology – now we’ve
got a problem. Want a PhD in feminist
theory – pay for it in cash.
John M Greco
Labels:
Liberals and Liberalism,
Obama
Friday, June 1, 2012
Avanti! Redux
While flipping through TV channels late one recent evening I
came across a Billy Wilder film I had never seen. Being a fan of many of his pictures, particularly
One, Two, Three (the subject of an
early post on this blog), Stalag 17, Some Like It Hot, and the lesser known Kiss Me Stupid, I took a flyer. Glad I did.
I only saw part of the movie the first time through, though, joining
somewhere in progress, but that didn’t bother me. When I was growing up, my father would take
my brother and me to the movies some Sunday afternoons, and we would get to the
theater whenever we got there and join the movie in progress, then later sit through
the beginning and leave at the point we came in. Arriving at the theater before the beginning of
a picture came to me later. Fortunately this time, I was able to record a later showing of the film and watch
it from the beginning a few days later.
Avanti! is a
romantic comedy, and something a bit more.
It tells the bittersweet story of an American (Jack Lemmon) and a Brit (Juliet Mills)
who independently journey to Ischia in the Bay of Naples, he to retrieve the
body of his father and she that of her mother, both of whom just died together
in an automobile crash. Lemmon discovers
to his chagrin that the two elders had been having a surreptitious one-month summer
affair for 10 years. The movie becomes
an understated story of the beginning of a second generation affair between two
unlikely people who start out at odds, but where soon enough the gruff
exterior of the harried American businessman softens in the face of the
charm of Ms Mills’s character and of the Italian setting (Italy isn’t a country,
it’s an emotion, says Ms Mills). Remarkably,
Avanti! isn’t very well known today, and isn’t shown much on cable TV (as a
veteran channel-flipper, I know), but on release in 1972 it received 6 Golden
Globe nominations, and one win (Lemmon).
The movie reminds me of a late-career, very personal, and
similarly undeservedly underappreciated picture by another favorite director of
mine – John Ford’s Donovan’s Reef. Like that one, this one is full of the
director’s many special touches – comedy, sentimentality, satire. Mills’s riff on not being taken for granted
while she enthusiastically unpacks her clothes in Lemmon’s room is hilarious, the
hotel manager is superb, the medicinal mud baths promise an older diplomat the
acidity of a man of 20, and it’s delightful to discover how well-stocked the
ristorante is with the many varieties of pasta.
There’s plenty of the sardonic
humor for which writers Wilder and Diamond are known – an impatient,
overbearing American diplomat is approaching the small island in a
helicopter and asks the pilot “Are you sure this is Ischia, because I do not want to land in Africa?”, from whom comes the reply “That would be bigger”. Subtle comedic touches abound -- the movement of the door handle at a moment of Sicilian passion, the pop of a wine bottle at dinner, a reflexive fascist salute, soaking fingernails in a sugar bowl. The beautiful score
consists mostly of well-chosen established Italian tunes – Un’ Ora Sola Ti Vorrei, A
Tazza E’ CafĂ©, and Senza Fine particularly
set the moods and pace. At its core, this
is the story of an awakening, a passing through a doorway to a fuller life – Permesso? Avanti!
R Balsamo
Labels:
Arts and Entertainment,
Movies
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Heaven's Gate Once Again
Lately I’ve been watching the “director’s cut” of the movie Heaven’s Gate, the 1980 epic that
supposedly bankrupted a studio and effectively ended the career of director
Michael Cimino. I saw at a theater the original
release of a truncated version, which bombed on debut. The longer cut is a much better film that perhaps
deserves more appreciation.
The film has two story lines: the larger is the conflict between powerful Wyoming
cattle ranchers and the poor Eastern European immigrants who are spilling onto grazing
land, and the smaller is the love triangle involving a brothel madam (Isabelle
Huppert) and her two lovers, the local lawman named Averill (Kris Kristofferson)
and the enforcer for the cattlemen named Champion (Christopher Walken).
The film’s structure is in three parts: a main narrative set over a short period of
time in Wyoming bookended by a long 20 minute prologue of the Harvard class of
1870’s graduation ceremonies and a short epilogue set back east in
Newport. The main character is Averill, one
of the Harvard graduates who years later is the county lawman duty-bound to
protect the immigrants but who seems at times wearily resigned to the
inevitability of their oppression by the powerful and violence-prone ranchers. Billy (John Hurt), classmate and friend of
Averill, speaks at the graduation ceremony and concludes that society is “well
arranged”, contravening the main graduation speaker who encouraged the men to
make the world a better place. Twenty
years later they both are out West, where society is definitely not “well
arranged”, although Averill is trying to make it more so.
The film has problems, to be sure. The uneven narrative meanders, lingering here
and there with poignant “slice of life” segments such as a rousing roller
skating scene and the graduation segment.
Poor sound quality and mumbled dialog (this could almost be an Altman
movie) makes the narrative frustratingly hard to decipher in places. Nevertheless, the movie is captivating,
surprisingly so since the plot in many ways is so mundane. It’s beautifully filmed in many parts, especially
those showing the hardscrabble lives of the immigrant poor, their perseverance
and resilience in the face of great hardship, and their exuberance and emotionalism
as well. Perhaps the movie works best as
a collection of slice-of-life portraits, which somehow taken together amount to
more than the whole.
“Heaven’s Gate”, incidentally, is the name of the roller skating
rink in the immigrant-dominated town of Sweetwater which proudly proclaims in writing to offer a “moral and exhilarating experience”. The film reminds me of another revisionist Western
with a story similarly of growing intensity, explosive violence, and haunting music -- Sergio
Leone’s 1968 film Once Upon a Time in the West, which itself incorporated many
references to earlier Westerns and whose story revolves around a railroad baron’s
ruthless ways that eventually lead to his ruin at a crucial piece of land
named, perhaps only coincidentally, Sweetwater.
R Balsamo
Labels:
Arts and Entertainment,
Movies
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Obama Gets More Nervous
Today comes news (link) that President Barack Obama has
publicly declared, in an ABC interview "hastily" arranged this morning, support for gay marriage, just a day after voters in swing-state North
Carolina defeated (link) a proposition in favor of such. This announcement also comes a day after
Obama was nearly beaten (link) by an obscure incarcerated felon in the West
Virginia Democratic Party primary, for which some Democrats are shockingly blaming
(link) Democrat voters’ racism rather than disgust with Obama’s record, after voters
in Wisconsin came out shockingly strongly for Republican governor Scott Walker
in the primary for the recall election (link), and after Obama’s favorite
Republican senator, the squishy Dick Lugar, shockingly overwhelmingly lost in
the Indiana primary.
Add to that national
popularity polls that show Obama either behind Romney or just only slightly
ahead in those propaganda polls that overweight Democrats so that Obama comes out
on top. Bottom line is this picture
looks to me like Obama now ever more so desperately feels the needs to shore up
his unenthusiastic base and continue to distract away from his record and from
the economy. All these are positive signs
for Romney, if he stays on message.
John M Greco
Labels:
National Politics and Issues,
Obama
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Change, Then Hope
I've read that Barack Obama's new slogan for his reelection campaign is "Forward". Anne Sorock writes at Legal Insurrection (link): "Similar to the 2008 concept, Change, this one-word slogan captures a vague sense of movement without articulating a strategy, end, or principle. The movement this terms evokes is no more than a different state than we’re currently in, and a positive trajectory." Well, when you have a disastrous record, you can't run on that, so what have you? Apparently an appeal to go "Forward", which, in a remarkable coincidence, happens to be an old socialist slogan (link) [not to mention the Wisconsin state motto (link)]. Hmmm.
Here's my suggestion for Romney: "Change, Then Hope".
John M Greco
Here's my suggestion for Romney: "Change, Then Hope".
John M Greco
Labels:
National Politics and Issues,
Obama
Friday, April 27, 2012
Harvard & Liberal Dem Senate Candidate Speak with Forked Tongue in Diversity Fraud
Oops. Fraud is such strong language, but if the shoe fits.... Let's see -- years ago, liberal Harvard comes under flak for not having enough minorities on its Law School faculty, so poof! it offers up a woman named Elizabeth Warren as part American Indian, and wallah! Diversity! Problem (link): she can't prove it, apparently relying instead on "family stories", and fantastically claims that despite contemporaneous Harvard publications touting her minority status, she remembers nothing about it all. Besides, she now says to questioners, “You’re trying to raise something from 15 years ago.” You see, she's a law professor and knows the statue of limitations on fraud has run. Warren is also embroiled in another kerfuffle about a 10-year interest-free loan she has received from Harvard for reasons unclear. Hmmm.
Oh, this ultraliberal Native American and Obama acolyte Warren is running as the Democrat candidate for Senate in the Bay State.
John M Greco
Oh, this ultraliberal Native American and Obama acolyte Warren is running as the Democrat candidate for Senate in the Bay State.
John M Greco
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Notre Dame Profs Outraged Over Bishop’s Criticism of Obama, Infanticide Protector and Notre Dame Honoree
Finally, over a
hundred professors of the apparently nominally-Catholic University of Notre
Dame have found something to be outraged about.
They weren't outraged when Notre Dame honored (link; link) Barack Obama, one
of the, if not the, leading defender (link; link; link; link; link) in the Illinois legislature of infanticide, where hospital nurses placed viable infants born alive after botched
abortions alone in storage rooms to die without medical care, a practice famously
publicized by a nurse who had witnessed it at the incongruously-named
Christ Hospital in suburban Chicago.
But let a Bishop criticize Obama and the Notre
Dame faculty erupts like Mount Vesuvius.
The Chicago Tribune reports (link) that “More than a hundred University
of Notre Dame professors have demanded that Illinois Bishop Daniel Jenky renounce
comments he made criticizing President Barack Obama's stance on religious
liberty that compared him to dictators Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin....” The Bishop is a Notre
Dame graduate and sits on the ND Board of Fellows and Board of Trustees, says the
Tribune. “In his homily, Jenky compared
the administration's stance to anti-religious figures in history such as Hitler
and Stalin who 'have tried to force Christians to huddle and hide within
the confines of their churches.' "
Infanticide? To each his
own. Late Term Partial Birth Abortions? Who am I to judge? Criticize Obama? HOW DARE YOU?
So goes the Catholic University of Notre Dame, a great institution that has fallen of late into some very bad hands.
John M Greco
Labels:
Liberals and Liberalism,
Obama
Friday, April 20, 2012
The Obama Eating Dog Story Looks To Have Legs
What does Obama call Romney’s dog? Meals on WheelsObama has been “hoist with his own petard”, to recall Shakespeare’s phrase. How apropos. I’m getting a big kick out of the way the Democrat’s cruelty to dogs smear against Romney has boomeranged to smash them squarely in their collective head.
If I had a dog, it would look like the dog Obama ate*
Recap: on a family car trip, Romney placed their dog on the car’s roof in a secured dog carrier fitted with a wind shield. Word from the Romney family is that not only did the dog do fine, the dog liked it. This would come as no surprise to any sentient being who would have observed that dogs love to stick their heads out of car windows at high speeds, something that has always amazed me. But the Obama campaign Democrat brain trust seems somehow to have missed ever seeing such a thing.
New
Obama Campaign Theme ....How Much Is That Doggie In The Window
And of course, since Obama can’t run on his record by a long shot, all they can do is dredge up 30 year old tiny stories like this one in a desperate and surely pathetic attempt to gain traction with inattentive and easily fooled voters – i.e., the kind the Democrat controlist elite depends on for votes but whom they secretly despise.
Harry
Truman: if you want a friend in Washington, get a dog. Good thing Obama wasn’t around then.
Well, not only does turn out that the Romney dog loved the rooftop carrier, but that Obama wrote about eating dog as a child with his Muslim step-father in Indonesia in his memoir “Dreams From My Father.” The Obama Smear Brain Trust Missed that one too – obviously no one actually read, or at least remembered, Obama’s book.
Perhaps we should refer to the President as Bark ObamaAmidst all this humor, David Goldman sees (link) a deeper, and longer-lasting meaning:
What a careful reader will take away from Barack Obama’s memoir “Dreams From My Father” is not only that the president used to eat dog meat, but more importantly, that he identifies with dog-eaters. He wants us to understand that he is one of them.... [T]here is something far more visceral, more existential to the president’s dislike of the United States, and that arises from his early residence in the Third World, and his identification with the people of the Third World whose lives are disrupted by the creative destruction that America has unleashed.
It really isn’t unfair at all to bring Obama’s canine consumption to public attention. The president isn’t really one of us. He’s a dog-eater. He tells the story in his memoir to emphasize that viscerally, Obama identifies with the Third World of his upbringing more than with the America of his adulthood. It is our great misfortune to have a president who dislikes our country at this juncture in our history.The bottom line is that for the Obama team, the Romney canine-on-the-roof smear is one dog that won’t hunt.
After his defeat in November, Obama won’t eat crow -- he'll want collieJohn M Greco
* a reference of
course to Obama’s inappropriate, inflammatory, and prejudicial comment on the
Martin/Zimmerman affair
** The quips and jokes
aren’t mine -- I’ve seen them at various webs sites
Labels:
National Politics and Issues,
Obama
Thursday, April 12, 2012
The Prosecutor Takes Sides in the Martin/Zimmerman Affair, and Justice Sighs
I caught today on radio the first few minutes of special prosecutor Angela Corey’s news conference in the Martin/Zimmerman affair, at which she announced (link) second degree murder charges against George Zimmerman for the killing of Trayvon Martin, and I was shocked to hear her opening remarks refer to speaking with the family of the dead young man and her sympathy for them. Prosecutors are supposed to examine the evidence in a dispassionate manner and make determinations in a fair, impartial manner without even the appearance of impropriety or bias. Well, not so here, not at all so here.
Here are special prosecutor Corey’s opening words after introducing herself:
We have already seen, in this highly politicized affair, black liberal Democrats such as Obama, Sharpton, and Jackson foment a lynch-mob atmosphere, and major liberal news organizations NBC and ABC distort the facts through highly deceptive and prejudicial editing of audio and video tapes. We have seen some news organizations, such as the New York Times and Gwen Ifill, a black liberal public TV commentator, refer to the half-Hispanic and half-white Zimmerman as “half-white” and “white” respectively, terms apparently never before used by them for a person at least half Hispanic. We have seen the New Black Panthers, a racist organization already on video record for intimidation of white voters in Philadelphia in a case that black Obama Attorney General Holder ignores, issue “Wanted Dead or Alive” posters for alleged shooter Zimmerman. So much for Obama’s Hope and Change and a new era of race relations in America. And now the local prosecutor in Florida has joined the mob.
Attorney William Jacobson writes (link) at Legal Insurrection blog: “What irked me was to hear the prosecutor thank the Martin family attorneys.... For the prosecutor to embrace the Martin family attorneys with thanks at the press conference, and for AG [Obama Attorney General] Eric Holder verbally to praise Sharpton today, tells me that a case which should be about facts of who did what to whom is going to turn into an even bigger racial narrative for a variety of purposes which have nothing to do with the guilt or innocence of the accused.”
A commenter to the above-referenced post wrote: ‘The [prosecutor’s] comment about seeking “justice for Trayvon” did not sit well with many attorneys that I know who heard the comments. It was unprofessional at best on the part of a prosecutor who should KNOW better with a case this potentially charged. The prosecutor attempted to mitigate through her later comments, but the damage was done. It is not to seek justice for an individual, but simply to do justice (whatever that happens to be).’
It’s the Duke Lacrosse racial lynch mob hysteria all over again – for some, dispassionate examination of the facts is avoided, and all that matters is for blacks to get a sacrificial offering to make up for past injustice. Whether or not the actual accused is guilty matters not. Here are comments from today from a law professor, a law professor for God's sake, in the Obama Administration (link):
Here are special prosecutor Corey’s opening words after introducing herself:
“Just moments ago we spoke by phone with Sabrina Fulton and Tracy Martin. It was less than three weeks ago that we told those sweet parents that we would get answers to all of their questions no matter where our quest for the truth led us. And it is the search for justice for Trayvon that has brought us to this moment.”
“Those sweet parents”?! “Search for justice for Trayvon"?! And the prosecutor's on an intimate, first name basis already with the deceased?!
We have already seen, in this highly politicized affair, black liberal Democrats such as Obama, Sharpton, and Jackson foment a lynch-mob atmosphere, and major liberal news organizations NBC and ABC distort the facts through highly deceptive and prejudicial editing of audio and video tapes. We have seen some news organizations, such as the New York Times and Gwen Ifill, a black liberal public TV commentator, refer to the half-Hispanic and half-white Zimmerman as “half-white” and “white” respectively, terms apparently never before used by them for a person at least half Hispanic. We have seen the New Black Panthers, a racist organization already on video record for intimidation of white voters in Philadelphia in a case that black Obama Attorney General Holder ignores, issue “Wanted Dead or Alive” posters for alleged shooter Zimmerman. So much for Obama’s Hope and Change and a new era of race relations in America. And now the local prosecutor in Florida has joined the mob.
Attorney William Jacobson writes (link) at Legal Insurrection blog: “What irked me was to hear the prosecutor thank the Martin family attorneys.... For the prosecutor to embrace the Martin family attorneys with thanks at the press conference, and for AG [Obama Attorney General] Eric Holder verbally to praise Sharpton today, tells me that a case which should be about facts of who did what to whom is going to turn into an even bigger racial narrative for a variety of purposes which have nothing to do with the guilt or innocence of the accused.”
A commenter to the above-referenced post wrote: ‘The [prosecutor’s] comment about seeking “justice for Trayvon” did not sit well with many attorneys that I know who heard the comments. It was unprofessional at best on the part of a prosecutor who should KNOW better with a case this potentially charged. The prosecutor attempted to mitigate through her later comments, but the damage was done. It is not to seek justice for an individual, but simply to do justice (whatever that happens to be).’
It’s the Duke Lacrosse racial lynch mob hysteria all over again – for some, dispassionate examination of the facts is avoided, and all that matters is for blacks to get a sacrificial offering to make up for past injustice. Whether or not the actual accused is guilty matters not. Here are comments from today from a law professor, a law professor for God's sake, in the Obama Administration (link):
Christi Cunningham, an associate secretary of regulation at the [Obama Administration] Department of Labor and a law professor at Howard University, spoke today at the National Action Network’s conference in Washington, D.C. Cunningham started her speech by calling for “justice for Trayvon Martin” and preempting the impending trial of George Zimmerman by asking rhetorically, “Why are people acting like this is a confusing situation and we don’t know what happened? We know exactly what happened, because it’s happened before.”In reaction to the second degree murder charge based on how the facts known so far match up against what is required for the prosecution to prove second degree murder, one commenter at National Review Online said “How disgusting the State Attorney denied a grand jury the opportunity to review the evidence and determine what, if any, charges it supported against Zimmerman in order to make a craven, politicized, possibly unethical charging decision on her own.”
I have no idea what happened that night, but I'm repelled by the lynch mob atmosphere and the stated effort of the special prosecutor to "search for justice for Trayvon". I want to see justice done, not justice for Travon Martin or justice for George Zimmerman. Just justice.
John M Greco
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Show Boat at the Lyric Opera
| Chicago's Civic Opera House |
| Show Boat Backdrop on the Stage of the Civic Opera House |
The narrative spans several decades, and, against the backdrop themes of racial privilege and discrimination and the timelessness of the River, at the core is the sad story of a young woman who, despite being warned of the danger of falling in love with a “no-account river fella” because when “a girl like you starts to love a man, she don’t stop so easy,” nevertheless falls in love with a no-account river fella who later abandons her and their young daughter, proving that indeed, to her lifelong detriment, she couldn’t help lovin’ dat man.
R Balsamo
Labels:
Arts and Entertainment,
Chicago Miscellanea,
Music
Thursday, March 29, 2012
More Liberal Love & Lies From MSNBC About Healthcare in Repressive, Socialist Countries
Tom Friedman, the NY Times reporter who openly pines for the authoritarian control possessed by nominally-socialist dictators, which bestows an effectiveness unencumbered by the retrograde necessities of free elections and the rule of law, you’ve got more company.One of the biggest lies used to impugn U.S. healthcare in particular and the American system of free-enterprise in general is that the infant mortality rate is much lower most everywhere else in the world, especially in those authoritarian, freedomless countries American liberals admire so much.
Now comes propagandist Andrea Mitchell, who on MSNBC (link) “did a particularly fawning segment about Cuba’s health-care system”, referring to “the advantages of the Cuban system, the low infant-mortality rate, for instance, which is legendary around the world.... As the conversation continued, MSNBC splashed the headline ‘Cuba’s Infant Mortality Rate Is Better than the U.S.’ across the bottom of the screen."
I seriously doubt that anyone outside of the most deluded liberal precincts (which include MSNBC) truly believes that “Cuba’s Infant Mortality Rate Is Better than the U.S.”
From Ramesh Ponnuru (link):
[L]iberal columnist ... Cohen’s top reasons for thinking [the U.S. has] a crummy [healthcare] system are our relatively low life expectancy and our relatively high infant mortality rate.... As conservatives and libertarians have pointed out time and again, the health-care system is not the reason for these statistics. Here’s the way I put it a couple of years ago: “In this country, a premature delivery followed by death would be counted toward the infant-mortality rate; not so in some other countries. And whatever we think of our health-care system, it is not to blame for the fact that America has a lot of car wrecks and homicides. When health economist Robert Ohsfeldt and John Schneider adjusted for these factors, the U.S. had the highest life expectancy of any developed country. (And they didn’t correct for obesity rates, which would make our advantage look even bigger, just like our waistlines.)”
The fact is that for decades, the U.S. has shown superior infant-mortality rates using official National Center for Health Statistics and European Perinatal Health Report data — in fact, the best in the world outside of Sweden and Norway, even without correcting for any of the population and risk-factor differences deleterious to the U.S. — for premature and low-birth-weight babies, the newborns who actually need medical care and who are at highest risk of dying.
In summary, the analysis and subsequent comparison of neonatal- and infant-mortality rates have been filled with inconsistencies and pitfalls, problematic definitions, and inaccuracies. Even the use of the most fundamental term, “live births,” greatly distorts infant-mortality rates, because often the infants who die the soonest after birth are not counted as live births outside the United States. In the end, these comparisons reflect deviations in fundamental terminology, reporting accuracy, data sources, populations, and cultural-medical practices — all of which specifically disadvantage the U.S. in international rankings. And unbeknownst to organizations bent on painting a picture of inferior health care in the U.S., the peer-reviewed literature and even the WHO’s own statements agree.Oh, one more thing about Cuba -- another reason for its supposedly low infant mortality rate, which even to begin with is not believable: “terminating the risky [pregnancies] at what may be the world’s highest abortion rate, with some reports indicating that it is more than 60 percent.” (link)
Let’s see where Mitchell goes for medical care the next time she’s really sick. Any bets that it’s Cuba? Where will her doctors have been trained? Any bets on Cuba, or some other third world country?
Either Andrea Mitchell (like so many other liberals who bash America by falsely embellishing socialist countries) is stupid and unaware of the truth, or she’s lying in furtherance of her greater political cause. My money’s on the latter.
John M Greco
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Should Republicans Be a Strong Horse or a Weak One?
The estimable Peter Wehner calls out (link) Rick Santorum for pushing back hard against a New York Times reporter, and appears to endorse the squishy Britt Hume’s take on it all, as opposed to Sarah Palin’s.
I am not a particular fan of Palin, who often does herself no favors despite the horrible smear job she has taken from the liberal media (and sometimes from some conservative media as well, not to mention McCain and his campaign staff), and I have no knowledge of the specific Santorum incident. However, having said that, it has been "sober, mature, thoughtful and reasonable" milquetoast conservatives, similar in nature to Hume, whose inability or unwillingness to stand up to the leftists and their agenda has enabled Obama and his ilk to bring us to where we are now. Despite his considerable baggage, Gingrich showed, for a while until he lost his way again, how to push back against the overt and covert biased liberals in the media.
When politically unknowledgeable or indifferent voters look at the parties, and, as a well-known political operative once said along this line, when they see one that looks like a strong horse and one that looks weak, they are naturally drawn to the strong horse.
John M Greco
Labels:
National Politics and Issues
Friday, March 16, 2012
Unilateral Disarmament
During a visit to Afghanistan, Obama's top war leader Defense Secretary Leon Panetta had an audience of about 200 American troops disarmed (link; link) before entering the large tent to boost their morale. Panetta's aides brushed it all off as a harmless precaution, saying with all the talk among Democrats back in the States they got a bit mixed-up as to who was on which side, but they think they've got it all straight now, so no harm no foul. Major General Mark Gurganus, an American, laughed it all off, saying "this is not a big deal," and in an unconfirmed report was heard to say that anyone can make a mistake and that the Panetta team was quickly brought up to speed on the connection between the Obama Administration and the American troops. All's well that ends well.
John M Greco
John M Greco
Labels:
Obama
Thursday, March 15, 2012
"I pledge allegiance to Barack Obama, and ...."
A Florida Democratic Party county chairwoman flies over Party headquarters an American flag altered with President Obama's image in place of the stars, and sees nothing wrong with that (link), asserting that "certain elements cannot accept Barack Obama as president" and perhaps reasoning that it's easier for Democrats to pledge allegiance to the Leader when his face is on the flag. What a woman -- patriotism and brains.John M Greco
Labels:
Liberals and Liberalism,
Obama
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
Aida at the Lyric Opera
I took in Aida at the Lyric Opera the other day, and I do mean take in, for Aida one needs eyes as well as ears. Outside of the vault scene perhaps not the most melodic of Italian operas, but is there one with more exotic pageantry? Well, none that I’ve seen and this year’s offering at the Lyric does not disappoint. New Lyric General Director Anthony Freud writes in the guide book that this production is “as sumptuous a vision of this glorious work as you will find in any opera house today.” Chinese soprano Hui He was fantastic as Aida and received a very warm ovation; the program guide says she’s sung the role many times, including at the Met and the Verona Arena. Amneris was sung by Russian mezzo-soprano Anna Smirnova, whom Jay Nordlinger in The New Criterion said “sang with aplomb and guts” last season at the Met in Don Carlo, another by Verdi on a large scale.
I'm fortunate to have seen Pavarotti about 30 years ago at the Lyric as Radames. The guide book says that this year’s production is the one by Joel/Halmen that premiered with Pavarotti in 1983, but then, I seem to remember, the doomed lovers sang to each other in a vault with the spurned and remorseful Anmeris standing over them, while this time she was beneath them. Well, either way, the love duet is the musical piece most worth waiting for, and one has to wait a good while – Aida is a long opera. Once again, no elephants, but stunning visuals, rousing choruses, spectacular processionals, just enough ballet, great voices, and an unbeatable finale – grand opera indeed.
R Balsamo
Labels:
Arts and Entertainment,
Chicago Miscellanea,
Music,
Opera
Sunday, March 11, 2012
On Bernini: His Life and His Rome
![]() |
| Bernini: His Life and His Rome Franco Mormando University of Chicago, 2011 |
Bernini was born in Naples of a Tuscan father, a sculptor himself, and a Neapolitan mother, and is said to have gotten his artistry from the former and his temperament from the latter. Before long his remarkable talent was discovered in Rome. He perhaps best defines the Baroque emphasis on natural realism filled with the two elements that most come to my mind when looking at a Bernini sculpture -- emotion and movement. Although he was primarily a sculptor and architect, he sometimes designed entire artistic presentations, perhaps best illustrated by The Ecstasy of St. Theresa, that combined sculpture, painting, architecture, and decoration into a beautiful whole called “bel composto.”
The backgrounds on his greatest works are well covered: Apollo and Daphne (which, according to D’Epiro and Pinkowish in Sprezzatura, Bernini considered his “most virtuosic sculpture”), The Rape of Proserpina (Pluto and Persephone), David, The Ecstasy of St. Theresa, the Fountain of the Four Rivers, the Roman Jesuit church Saint’ Andrea al Quirinale (said to be his most self-satisfying composition, and what Mormando calls "the jewel of his architectural crown"), and of course his work at St Peter’s Basilica.
Bernini became a wealthy man but by late in life he was somewhat reviled in Rome by the commoners as a living symbol of Papal extravagance amidst widespread poverty. After his death, the Baroque style fell quickly from tastes in favor of the neoclassical, and Bernini’s status seems only to have revived in recent generations. To me, his work is more appealing than some of the cold and stiff works of Renaissance and neo-classical artists.
Completing the book over a period of a few weeks, and reading other books and materials concurrently as I typically do, I needed to resort to keeping notes on index cards to keep track of the Popes and other characters as well as Bernini’s major works in each phase of his life. A detailed time line of events, a glossary of major characters, and a few maps would have helped immensely. I also would have liked more detail about Bernini’s daily life and his family, with occasional “day in the life” portraits. Nevertheless, Mormando’s story is engaging, informative, and well-referenced, and attractively bound in a rich cloth cover by the University of Chicago Press.
There is, surprisingly, no public memorial to Bernini in Rome, whose cityscape owes so much to the man’s influence. Mormando closes by imagining an indignant retort by Bernini’s son and biographer Domenico: “ ‘You seek a mere marble tomb? A single, puny plaque? A lone portrait to contain the memory of so colossal a genius?’ Instead, grandly sweeping his arm across the magnificent panorama of the city of Rome, he invites us with haughty but justifiable pride: ‘If you seek his monument, just look around you!’ ”
R. Balsamo
Labels:
Arts and Entertainment,
Books,
History
Sunday, February 26, 2012
At the Movies = “Act of Valor” Hits All Targets
I saw the new movie Act of Valor and found it quite engrossing and engaging. It tells the fictional story of a team of US Navy Seals in action at various points around the globe working to hunt down a group of terrorists, and reportedly uses real Seals to play those roles instead of actors (and most are pretty good). The lasting impression to the viewer is the seriousness, dedication, skill, and selflessness with which these incredible men protect their countrymen.
The movie is well-paced with lots of action, and, given the current anti-American, Islamist-apologetic mindset predominant in Hollywood today, remarkably the bad guys are real-life bad guys (i.e., terrorists) and the good guys are real-life good guys (e.g., Navy Seals and the US government); notably, the good guys are not sympathetically-portrayed homicidal Islamists or third-worlders with grievances, and the bad guys are not higher ups in the US government (in a Republican administration, of course). How original, how novel – and in a very entertaining movie to boot!
John M Greco
Labels:
Arts and Entertainment,
Movies
Sunday, January 29, 2012
A Chapter from the Liberal Media’s Brave New World
The Associated Press reports (link):
In its 930 word report, there is no mention of Islam, leaving readers to speculate as to whether it played a role in the motivation of Mohammad and his "co-wife". The Associated Press clearly thinks not.
Also, toward the end the article eventually identifies the "three teenage sisters" as daughters of the man convicted of the "honor killings", and strongly implies that they were also daughters of the second wife. "Honor killings" are known as murders in some circles outside the Associated Press.
Not much to see here, move right along.
J Greco
A jury ... found an Afghan father, his wife and their son guilty of killing three teenage sisters and a co-wife in what the judge described as "cold-blooded, shameful murders" resulting from a "twisted concept of honor" in a case that shocked and riveted Canadians.... Prosecutors said the defendants allegedly killed the three teenage sisters because they dishonored the family by defying its disciplinarian rules on dress, dating, socializing and using the Internet.... The jury [found] Mohammad Shafia, 58; his wife Tooba Yahya, 42; and their son Hamed, 21, each guilty of four counts of first-degree murder. First-degree murder carries an automatic life sentence with no chance of parole for 25 years.
Also, toward the end the article eventually identifies the "three teenage sisters" as daughters of the man convicted of the "honor killings", and strongly implies that they were also daughters of the second wife. "Honor killings" are known as murders in some circles outside the Associated Press.
Not much to see here, move right along.
J Greco
Labels:
Islam,
Liberals and Liberalism,
Media Bias
Monday, January 2, 2012
Obama in the Twilight Zone
We Americans start the new year with Democrat President Barack Obama continuing to show his utter disdain for truth and honesty and his inner totalitarian self.
Peter Wehner: Obama Enters the Twilight Zone (link):
And to top it off, when few were paying attention on New Year's eve Obama signed into law the controversial (link; link; link) National Defense Authorization Act which, inter alia, allows him to indefinitely detain American citizens without trial, with which I wholeheartedly disagree. Apparently it was the Obama people who insisted (link) that this power over American citizens be included in the final version of the bill, and yet upon signing it Obama professes to have "reservations" about it. He wants it both ways -- to be for it and against it at the same time. Just part of Obama's continuing assault on truth in his personal Twilight Zone.
John M Greco
Peter Wehner: Obama Enters the Twilight Zone (link):
... To really enter the Twilight Zone, consider these two priceless sentences from the New York Times story: “Winning a full-year extension of the payroll tax, [Obama spokesman] Mr. Earnest said, will still be a top priority. He noted that House Republicans were now also arguing that it should be extended for a year, after some initially opposed extending it at all.”
Come again? On December 13, the GOP House passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax cut – and was promptly criticized by – you guessed it — the president. Obama favored a much shorter, two-month extension. House Republicans, under intense political pressure, eventually agreed to the two-month extension. Now the White House is declaring a full-year extension is a “top priority.” Yet as recently as three weeks ago the opposition to the president’s “top priority” came not from House Republicans but from Obama himself.
We are now reaching the point in which the president is running a truly post-modern campaign, in which there is no objective truth but simply narrative. Obama’s campaign isn’t simply distorting the facts; it is inverting them. This kind of thing isn’t unusual to find in the academy. But to see a president and his campaign so thoroughly deconstruct truth in order to maintain power is quite rare. The sheer audacity of Obama’s cynicism is a wonder of the modern world.
Meanwhile, after three years into the Obama presidency, the Gitmo prison is still open. Remember liberals screaming about the "fierce moral urgency" to closing it down, which Obama promised would be one of the first things he would do if elected? I do. Where are those liberals now (link)?
And to top it off, when few were paying attention on New Year's eve Obama signed into law the controversial (link; link; link) National Defense Authorization Act which, inter alia, allows him to indefinitely detain American citizens without trial, with which I wholeheartedly disagree. Apparently it was the Obama people who insisted (link) that this power over American citizens be included in the final version of the bill, and yet upon signing it Obama professes to have "reservations" about it. He wants it both ways -- to be for it and against it at the same time. Just part of Obama's continuing assault on truth in his personal Twilight Zone.
John M Greco
Labels:
National Politics and Issues,
Obama
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






